barangay sixteenth century philippine culture and society summary

On one page they tell us that a ruling chief has life-and-death authority over his subjects, but on the next, that these subjects wander off to join some other chief if they feel like it. They do not, for example, distinguish legislative, judicial, and executive functions in native governments, nor do they even indicate whether datu is a social class or a political office. The accounts were not, of course, written by social scientists and are therefore understandably disorderly, imprecise, and even contradictory. Yet any history teacher who has tried to use them to extract even such simple details as the rights and duties of each social class, for purposes of his own understanding and his students’ edification, know how frustrating the exercise can be. At least four of these accounts were written for the specific purpose of analyzing Filipino society so that colonial administrators could make use of indigenous institutions to govern their new subjects. Landa Jocano in a convenient and inexpensive volume entitled The Philippines at the Spanish Contact. The major accounts on which it is based have been available in English since the publication of the Blair and Robertson translations early in the 2oth century, and have recently been made accessible to the general Filipino reading public by F.

This study offers summary results of a study of sixteenth century Filipino class structure insofar as it can be reconstructed from the data preserved in contemporary Spanish sources. (function($) (jQuery)) var $mcj = jQuery.noConflict(true) įilipino Class Structure in the Sixteenth Century

Barangay sixteenth century philippine culture and society summary